Search:

Type: Posts; User: NomakeWan

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Search: Search took 0.02 seconds.

  1. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Dang, that's awesome! Very useful stuff, thanks...

    Dang, that's awesome! Very useful stuff, thanks for that! I'll make a note of it in my XDF.
  2. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    By 'the XDF' I meant EEXTRA...

    By 'the XDF' I meant EEXTRA v0[1].001[MOD_V0005_03_02]V6_3, which has the majority of the code defined. But even with all the nitty-gritty experimental stuff commented, there still doesn't appear to...
  3. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    My stock '95 manual BIN has cal ID 16210071,...

    My stock '95 manual BIN has cal ID 16210071, 0x2000 16209648, 0x12000 16209647. I know for a fact it is stock and was never touched before I started fiddling with it.

    My stock '94 auto BIN was...
  4. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    It is not on the ALDL. The Entertainment and...

    It is not on the ALDL. The Entertainment and Comfort Bus which handle the radio and climate control are their own separate "network," and the HVAC system has to be patched into the ALDL connector...
  5. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Sounds like some incompatible patches,...

    Sounds like some incompatible patches, definitely. Two solutions:

    1. Just do as steveo mentions, uncheck 'install recovery ROM' and flash that way. It won't attempt to install the recovery ROM so...
  6. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Are you using the latest XDF from Steveo’s...

    Are you using the latest XDF from Steveo’s website in TunerPro? If so you shouldn’t get that error.

    That said, it’s nothing to be overly concerned about—the recovery patch is just a safeguard...
  7. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Ah, sorry, now I see what you mean. Raw...

    Ah, sorry, now I see what you mean.

    Raw E-Side/Raw T-Side are what you would flash directly to the EEPROM chips.

    E-Side/T-Side are for flashing over the ALDL (for example, if only one side or...
  8. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    E/T is for if you're flashing a BIN directly to...

    E/T is for if you're flashing a BIN directly to the chips on the actual PCB, for example if your PCM is bricked and you have the equipment necessary to flash the EEPROM chips themselves.

    Otherwise...
  9. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Correct. That’s the whole point of FlashHack...

    Correct. That’s the whole point of FlashHack actually—to just plain work out of the box on default settings.
  10. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    By unchecking these, you have potentially caused...

    By unchecking these, you have potentially caused the flash process to run slower, but it will not hurt anything to do so.

    1. Only Write Changed Sides; Won’t apply if you’ve never read from or...
  11. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Took me a second to figure out the new UI--namely...

    Took me a second to figure out the new UI--namely that I had to select one of the options. I just thought the middle section was text explaining what the tool was capable of rather than a menu.
    ...
  12. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    It can read from any device that accepts MODE 02...

    It can read from any device that accepts MODE 02 requests. You just need to know what its device ID is.
  13. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Had a chance to flash a new BIN to my '95 today...

    Had a chance to flash a new BIN to my '95 today after a bit of a drive at work. Flashhack correctly identified that I had already flashed it, identified the parts of the BIN that were unnecessary,...
  14. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Was gonna say, looked at it myself and it looks...

    Was gonna say, looked at it myself and it looks perfectly fine. Are you sure you're using the correct XDF for $EE? Either use steveo's EEX tuning definition (it's in his signature), or use EExtra...
  15. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Tested it out and it had zero issues reading...

    Tested it out and it had zero issues reading either car this time. No reboot problems. The unique signature is significantly shorter in this version, and the first two digits of both my cars match,...
  16. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    0.6.2 is still listed as the current version on...

    0.6.2 is still listed as the current version on your site. As soon as 0.6.3 is there, I'd be happy to test both. ;)
  17. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Sweet! Can’t wait to test out 0.6.3 when it’s out.

    Sweet! Can’t wait to test out 0.6.3 when it’s out.
  18. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Ooh, I'm gonna have to get me one of those OBDX...

    Ooh, I'm gonna have to get me one of those OBDX devices. I don't yet have an OBDII $EE, but if I were to get really lucky I might someday. It'd be nice to be able to flash and tune those LT4s just...
  19. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Sweet, thank you for the unique vehicle...

    Sweet, thank you for the unique vehicle identifier code! Tested it by reading both cars, and it saved the unique IDs just fine. Will need to actually make some changes to see if it recognizes them...
  20. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Tested it out on my '94, had to make some minor...

    Tested it out on my '94, had to make some minor changes to my tune anyway. Worked perfectly, and I like the new interface a lot. Only tiny oops is that the title screen still says 0.5.9 but I...
  21. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Hey steveo, just wanted to let you know that I...

    Hey steveo, just wanted to let you know that I tested 0.5.9 on my '95 and yes, it fixed the T-Side recovery patch bug. Flashed without any issues. So that being the case, I tried it on my '94. Didn't...
  22. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    All done. Turns out you had in fact ported over...

    All done. Turns out you had in fact ported over his E-Side comms stuff; you just accidentally placed an incomplete version under "Miscellaneous" that only included the MODE2/MODE3 message, while the...
  23. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Hilariously enough spotted it while looking for...

    Hilariously enough spotted it while looking for some stuff on your website and grabbed it.

    I've got the "Remove Patch" functionality for the EEHack stuff done, and am working on implementing the...
  24. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    I mean for me personally? No not really. Just I'm...

    I mean for me personally? No not really. Just I'm used to being able to revert stuff. :P
  25. Replies
    320
    Views
    275,271

    Oh, thanks for the EEX! I forgot it got updated...

    Oh, thanks for the EEX! I forgot it got updated to 4.0. Grabbed that and used it to patch my '94 for flash testing later. I did notice though that there's no "remove patch" in EEX for the EEHack...
Results 1 to 25 of 72
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3