ETC DBW Settiings?

[ralmo94]

I was going to change the [ECM] 33010 - Throttle Max Rotation % vs. RPM: & [ECM] 33012 - Throttle Max Rotation % vs. Pedal: Tables to try and get little better economy on a 2004 5.3 Silverado, I noticed the following 2 warnings from HP Tuners

[ECM] 33010 - Throttle Max Rotation % vs. RPM: Max throttle rotation in relation to RPM. WARNING!!! Modify this table at OWN RISK. Incompatibility of this calibration with the vehicle TAC module calibration may render PCM permanently inoperable.
[ECM] 33012 - Throttle Max Rotation % vs. Pedal: Max throttle rotation in relation to pedal. WARNING!!! Modify this table at OWN RISK. Incompatibility of this calibration with the vehicle TAC module calibration may render PCM permanently inoperable.

My Question is, I thought the max rotation allowed was safe to edit, and the relative position curve was the dangerous one that might not jive with the TAC?
How dangerous is it to edit these two tables?

[Pulse_GTO]

I believe you also need to change the redundant tables by the same percentage if not you could brick your PCM.

[ralmo94]

I believe you also need to change the redundant tables by the same percentage if not you could brick your PCM.

For the max rotation allowed?

[Pulse_GTO]

Any table that has a matching redundant table.

[ralmo94]

I don't think I have any redundant tables defined in HPT.
I played with some of these settings on a trailblazer once, but it was before I knew there was a possibility of bricking something, and if I remember correctly it wasn't a p59, it was an E38?

[Pulse_GTO]

What OS are you using? I know I have defined a ton of DBW tables and may have something that can help you.