Results 1 to 15 of 171

Thread: The ultimate LT1 $$EE patch thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,478
    Open loop Zero tps patch can be easily done. There is 32 bytes space(it`s used for rear 02 sensor) for that to achieve. Alot of variables can be put in place like timer, map range, or mph range. I will have to think about it. BLM cell cant be implemented because it needs to be in closed loop for cells to be updated. CCP is also doable but the way i see it there is no need for patch, just disable the ccp related errors, disconnenect valve and leave it as is(patch can be made also to save some processor load).

    Pinout for 95 and 96-97 transmission is the same. I suppose it can work with 95 code, but if there is difference in solenoid resistance, that might be a problem. I need to find out what`s the exact difference between 95 and 96-97 solenoids.
    I have been thinking for 98+ls1 transmission with plate and older 4l60 for tcc control.

    What do you think of external switches which can change MAF to speed density or loading second spark table.

  2. #2
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,055
    What do you think of external switches which can change MAF to speed density or loading second spark table.
    definitely a good idea.

  3. #3
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,022
    I'm running a 96 transmission with a 8051. Best I could find was the downshift solenoid is a higher resistance. It doesn't seem to matter because it works fine and didn't throw any codes.

  4. #4
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,478
    Initial version for OL zero tps patch.
    Different version for manual and auto.
    Forced Open loop with external switch on pin B23. ground needs to be applied on this pin through light diode and resistor, for visual confirmation.
    Also MAP and MPH check to enable.

    Initial version so use at your own risk.
    Feedback needed.

  5. #5
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,055
    Quote Originally Posted by kur4o View Post
    Initial version for OL zero tps patch.
    Different version for manual and auto.
    Forced Open loop with external switch on pin B23. ground needs to be applied on this pin through light diode and resistor, for visual confirmation.
    Also MAP and MPH check to enable.

    Initial version so use at your own risk.
    Feedback needed.
    awesome, i'll test it (except the auto version, i can't test)

  6. #6

  7. #7
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,478
    That`s good to know. Most likely something jumps not as expected. Bad news is, I don`t have access to running vehicle now and debugging will be very hard.
    I`ve been thinking to take new approach. Cell 16 is zero tps, zero mph, cell 17 is zero tps, very low map, cell 18 is zero mph, tps>0.
    Do you want open loop only in cell 16 and keep closed loop in other cells. I want to try to duplicate conditions for OL with the conditions of entering this cells.

  8. #8
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,478
    I`ve switched the settings for forced open loop commanded by PIN b23. (in open state I thought it was 0, but actually it`s 1)
    Now is fixed I hope the other part works as expected.

  9. #9
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,055
    Quote Originally Posted by kur4o View Post
    That`s good to know. Most likely something jumps not as expected. Bad news is, I don`t have access to running vehicle now and debugging will be very hard.
    i know that story... im afraid to experiment too much with my car since its my only car! but i'll try again soon

    Do you want open loop only in cell 16 and keep closed loop in other cells.
    that would be perfect...

  10. #10
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Camden, MI
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,026
    Quote Originally Posted by lionelhutz View Post
    Best I could find was the downshift solenoid is a higher resistance.
    less load on the quad/output driver, so I'd say that's not a problem. if inductance of the solenoid changed as well then it may want to be driven at a different frequency, but it sounds like it works as-is.
    1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3100 + 4T60E


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-03-2015, 03:38 AM
  2. EFI Live E38 VATS patch?
    By dave w in forum OBDII Tuning
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-06-2014, 01:41 AM
  3. $42 hack and hiway lean cruise patch
    By jim_in_dorris in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 05-07-2013, 12:54 PM
  4. Ultimate RPO Codes Complete GM PDF Database
    By EagleMark in forum Fuel Injection Writeups Articles and How to New and Old
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-29-2012, 06:11 PM
  5. Patch Bin From S19 record
    By EagleMark in forum TunerPro Tuning Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-19-2012, 10:59 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •