Was that due to a much larger heat sink available (in the form of the large container of water it operated on)?Originally Posted by Fast355
Was that due to a much larger heat sink available (in the form of the large container of water it operated on)?
-Phil, in Charleston, SC
'89 S10 Blazer: SOA SAS: Dana 44s, 5.7L V8, 700R4; 35s, 4.10:1; TBI with 1227747 ECM
'94 Grand Cherokee: 4.0, 4" lift, 31s
'90 Jeep Cherokee: In progress: 5.7L V8,700R4,NP231C, D44s. TBI with 1227747 ECM
'87 Fiero GT: 3.8SC (initial research stage)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks