Results 1 to 15 of 1723

Thread: Whatever!!!!!!!!! Gearhead-EFI Edition

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Camden, MI
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,026
    quote from VL400 on the delcohacking boards:

    The 808 is a custom MCU and does not offer the same options. You have these choices with register 4004...
    ; SS0 SS1 BAUD RATE
    ; 1 1 256
    ; 0 1 1024
    ; 1 0 8192
    ; 0 0 32768
    I have tried 32k baud (12P has selectable baud rate since v1.02) but its very unreliable - being a non-standard baud rate the divisors dont get close enough and you run errors.
    wonder if he wasn't using a FT232 chip?

    according to FTDI:

    The FT232R supports all standard baud rates and non-standard baud rates from 183 Baud up to 3 Mbaud. Achievable non-standard baud rates are calculated as follows -
    Baud Rate = 3000000 / (n + x)
    where n can be any integer between 2 and 16,384 and x can be a sub-integer of the value 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.375, 0.5, 0.625, 0.75, or 0.875.
    When n = 1, x = 0, i.e. baud rate divisors with values between 1 and 2 are not possible.
    3,000,000 / 32,768 = 91.552734375

    the closest we can achieve is therefore 91.5. that's an error of .0576%.... that's well within tolerance.

    now i'm kind of curious to see if this all actually works. logging at 4X normal speed would probably be largely pointless, but i wouldn't complain about ~44Hz full stream datalogging.
    1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3100 + 4T60E


  2. #2
    Super Moderator Six_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,968
    I wouldn't mind a faster logging stream.
    I know I've missed events because of the sampling rate being so slow.

    Never mind going to the 160 baud stream....
    The man who says something is impossible, is usually interrupted by the man doing it.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Camden, MI
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,026
    i'm making it a point to never touch another 160 baud system....

    imagine 32.768Kbaud using mode 3 commands... a good 30 to 40Hz can be achieved with very few items being logged at 8192. you would probably be logging faster than the ECM grabs A/D values or goes through minor loops...
    1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3100 + 4T60E


  4. #4
    Super Moderator Six_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,968
    Don't tease me...
    The man who says something is impossible, is usually interrupted by the man doing it.

  5. #5
    Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lakes Region, NH
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,868
    And you can remove data that you don't want and replace it with multiple sends of data you do want.

  6. #6
    Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lakes Region, NH
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,868

  7. #7
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Camden, MI
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,026
    http://www.delcohacking.net/forums/v...hp?f=14&t=2993

    80 + shipping out of australia isn't cheap, but it is probably the answer some people have been looking for.
    1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3100 + 4T60E


  8. #8
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    Quote Originally Posted by 1project2many View Post
    I've seen that truck before, unbelievable launch. The camper window opening at launch is priceless!


    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •