Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: Knock Sensor, Knock Filter, ESC and swaps!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Camden, MI
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,026
    that covers 90-93 as being C3 then. 16196391 used for 94-95 and it's also a C3... so i don't know why there are at least 3 different 3.1 filters.
    1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3100 + 4T60E


  2. #2
    Fuel Injected! JeepsAndGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    alabama
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,705
    Ohms have always been a weak point for me. Its one of the many things in life that confuse me. So I really have no clue what all those different settings mean other than it measures ohms in some way. I really have no idea what setting to use when trying to measure something, so I just try them all till it reads something. About the only times I read ohms is at request, like this thread. So I just post up what I read and hope the person needing the readings knows what the readings mean.
    79 Jeep Cherokee, AMC 401, T-18 manual trans, hydroboost, 16197427 MPFI system---the toy

    93 Jeep YJ Wrangler, 4.0L, 5 speed, 8.8 rear, homebrew hub conversion and big brakes, hydroboost, 2.5in OME lift, 31x10.50's---the daily driver

    99 Jeep WJ Grand Cherokee limited, 4.0L, auto, 2wd, leather and power everything, 99% stock---the long distance highway ride.

  3. #3
    Fuel Injected! JeepsAndGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    alabama
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,705
    Using the link Robert posted in Jim's toyota thread ( http://www.phormula.co.uk/KnockCalculator.aspx ) to calculate what a engines estimated knock feequency is, mine came out to 5.4kHz. Are there any knock filters/sensors that match that?
    If I'm reading that chart right, I saw 5 and 6, but nothing close to 5.4.
    I get crap loads of false knock with my current setup using a 350 knock filter and sensor, and I even took and mounted the sensor in a brass elbow. That helped some, as I now get hundreds of counts instead of thousands, but still cant use it. I tried a 454 knock filter but I got more counts with it than I did with the 350 filter.
    79 Jeep Cherokee, AMC 401, T-18 manual trans, hydroboost, 16197427 MPFI system---the toy

    93 Jeep YJ Wrangler, 4.0L, 5 speed, 8.8 rear, homebrew hub conversion and big brakes, hydroboost, 2.5in OME lift, 31x10.50's---the daily driver

    99 Jeep WJ Grand Cherokee limited, 4.0L, auto, 2wd, leather and power everything, 99% stock---the long distance highway ride.

  4. #4
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    False knock counts are sometimes an issue in a conversion, or even an old motor that came with the knock system stock, can be worse on stock engine modified and even the noise of headers alone can throw them off. Heck on Thirgen they tracked down false knock to a bushing on rear axle control arm!

    I don't know the answer?

    I do know that just taking out the knock sensor and disabling error code in a 1227747 is killer if you don't get rid of the ESC test.

    You could always build a safe spark advance table and take out knock sensor. But from memory in $0D can't remember if there is, or how to stop knock test?

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  5. #5
    Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lakes Region, NH
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,873
    Understanding Ohms is simple. It's the "something" that doesn't want electricity to flow. Ohms is to electricity like kinking a garden hose is to water flow. The more restriction, the less flow in the hose. The more ohms in the circuit, the less amps want to flow.

    But you don't need to know what Ohms are (is?) to take measurements correctly. Start with the lowest setting on the meter and move up from there. The lowest setting that gives a reading is the one to use.

    The LT1 knock sensor is 5.2 kHz. That may be due to an excess of mechanical noise. The sensors get "excited" at the frequency listed so you pick the one closest to your engine and go from there. The other values in the chart such as , gain and offset probably describe how the signal is tailored to the engine but until I know more, they're just numbers. There are a few relevant SAE papers that probably tell the whole story. Anyone here a member of SAE??

    Once upon a time I diagnosed false knock back to metal junk rattling around in the bed of the truck. Hard to believe in the knock system when stuff like that happens.

    Many of the circuits and ideas used on these EFI systems were either designed by Motorola or by Delco engineers. There are two relevant patents which have similar artwork and some similar claims. The first is by Motorola and was filed in 1980. The second is from Delco and was filed in 1983. At qucik glance, the Delco patent appears to be a combination of the Motorola patent plus a means to actually adjust spark timing.

    If I had some spare time I'd spend it trying to determine how closely the Motorola patent matches the knock filter in the memcal.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by 1project2many; 01-22-2013 at 04:58 AM.

  6. #6
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Camden, MI
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,026
    Quote Originally Posted by EagleMark View Post
    But from memory in $0D can't remember if there is, or how to stop knock test?
    later calibrations did away with the forced knock test.... 0D probably doesn't have it, especially if it's not in the XDF already. otherwise, would have to look around in the DTC43 area of the algorithm to see if there is a section that adds SA for a small amount of time as a test.

    Quote Originally Posted by 1project2many View Post
    Once upon a time I diagnosed false knock back to metal junk rattling around in the bed of the truck. Hard to believe in the knock system when stuff like that happens.
    WOW...... metal in the bed being detected as knock.... that's a new one for me. i have a bad lower engine mount causing some racket for me at the moment.
    1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3100 + 4T60E


  7. #7
    Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lakes Region, NH
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,873
    The metal in the bed was in a 90 or 91 R / V style truck with an aluminum flatbed that was not mounted on insulators. It was loud, but GM school teachers had told me the sensors would only pick up engine noise. I wasted a bunch of time ignoring the obvious.

  8. #8
    Super Moderator Six_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,968
    This is why I usually turn down the knock attack rate and listen for real knock. I don't trust knock sensors to be anything near accurate.
    The man who says something is impossible, is usually interrupted by the man doing it.

  9. #9
    Fuel Injected! JeepsAndGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    alabama
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,705
    Quote Originally Posted by RobertISaar View Post
    later calibrations did away with the forced knock test.... 0D probably doesn't have it, especially if it's not in the XDF already. otherwise, would have to look around in the DTC43 area of the algorithm to see if there is a section that adds SA for a small amount of time as a test.



    WOW...... metal in the bed being detected as knock.... that's a new one for me. i have a bad lower engine mount causing some racket for me at the moment.
    I was going to ask the same thing, does $0D have a knock test? Right now I have everything hooked up and "working", but have spark retard enable temp set to max and tuned my spark table by ear.
    This old Jeep probably has no shortage of noise making components. Heck, the old T18 4 speed makes a audible click with each shift, and 3rd gear syncro is a little worn and the teeth sometimes hit on downshifts. So with that being bolted straight to the engine, I'm sure it picks up noise from it to. I just always keep having a feeling I will never have a properly functioning knock system. But that doesnt keep me from trying.
    79 Jeep Cherokee, AMC 401, T-18 manual trans, hydroboost, 16197427 MPFI system---the toy

    93 Jeep YJ Wrangler, 4.0L, 5 speed, 8.8 rear, homebrew hub conversion and big brakes, hydroboost, 2.5in OME lift, 31x10.50's---the daily driver

    99 Jeep WJ Grand Cherokee limited, 4.0L, auto, 2wd, leather and power everything, 99% stock---the long distance highway ride.

  10. #10
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Alamogordo, NM
    Posts
    330
    WOW, looking at that KS freq calculator, im using the wrong sensor for my application. since im using the 3.1 v6 sensor on a 302, would that cause some false knock issues? doesnt seem to be too bad, just cant run more than 31* WOT advance without knock showing up, or going leaner than 12.8:1. anyone successfully use the LT4 knock filter and sensor? I saw an old thread on the TGO, but no real source for the filter.
    '86 Grand National

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •