I'd have to agree here, I had 3.07's in my caddy at first (donor truck had 3.07 in the 12 bolt, as all the power i'm making on a 62 year old rear end that was built for 142 horses sounded like trouble time to me, and just TRY to find a ring and pinion for a '51 caddy... HA!) and then switched to 3.73... I saw little change in MPG (more MPG in city driving with the 3.73 (seeing I didn't have to stab it all the time to move at all), about the same to 65 MPH on the highway, but then over 65, with the 3.73's I'm just rev'ing too high and MPG starts to drop off; i.e. 84 MPH = 3800 RPM; YIKES!). I do love the idea of a hot SBC with a man trans... But for me, the amount of surgery required for a 3rd pedal out weighs my lust for some good ole clutch dumping. Plus My hot rod 4x4 jeep is a 5-speed manual with a 340 HP 287ci straight six (lunati cam'd as well, and the sound a straight six makes at 6300 RPM is just AWESOME) and I can light my 35" tires in 1-3 gears, in 4wd; let alone 2wd... Also, there is something just not quite right about a caddy with a clutch pedal... Oh, thanks for the tip on AE I added 10% to TPS and MAP AE, she loved it, more playing with that tonight... And I still have PE off, as I'm still in fear of hooking up my knock sensor with this huge of a cam. This fall I'm planning to swap out my TH400 for a bowtie overdrive stage III 200-4R, is I can't get the 700-R4 to fit my x-frame without massive re-working of the frame (note to all that need to know it, 200-4R as the same size as a TH400, that can be a life saver). A lower first and a .68 OD, that way I'm not abusing my motor at 84 MPH and top speed should be near 200 (in a car orginally built to only go 75 MPH... that should be plenty). Also no more off the shelf torque converters for me... I'm going to pony up for one built for my motor/RPM range/car/gearing. The caddy is a tad portly for what most high stall TC are built for.
Bookmarks