Narrowband Tuning Tool

[steveo]

It appears Trimalyzer shows similar BLM vs. WBO2 data, like the WBO2 spreadsheet.

The WBO2 spreadsheet uses "Average IF" to calculate WBO2 data.

trimalyzer does the same thing, but has the flexibility to apply more math to each data point. i'd expect the data to be the same if 'strict cell' is chosen and if all filters are equal.

loose cell can affect multiple cells if the data point is close to a cell border. geometric is like a smarter 'loose cell', it affects adjacent cells with magnitude based on how far from the data point they are. i think it's way better, but whatever floats your boat.

[dave w]

trimalyzer does the same thing, but has the flexibility to apply more math to each data point. i'd expect the data to be the same if 'strict cell' is chosen and if all filters are equal.

loose cell can affect multiple cells if the data point is close to a cell border. geometric is like a smarter 'loose cell', it affects adjacent cells with magnitude based on how far from the data point they are. i think it's way better, but whatever floats your boat.

I'm liking the flexibility the Trimalyzer! Ultimately, "A Good Tune" is the goal for using Trimalyzer. How "A Good Tune" is achieved is up to the Tuner. Trimalyzer is an AWESOME "Tuning" tool!

dave w

[steveo]

ok try this, made some changes so arbitrary input should work as expected

http://fbodytech.com/trimalyzer/trimalyzer-download/

[dave w]

ok try this, made some changes so arbitrary input should work as expected

Works great!

dave w

WBO2 Trimalyzer 1.5.JPG

[joegreen]

Its good to see trimalyzer is still being worked on. Even though im not very familiar with it i think its a great tool.

[Casey96SS]

Just figured out how to get my WBO2 readings to show up in trimalyzer. Pretty cool!

Should I be adjusting the VE table in all map and RPM areas to get about a 13.0:1 reading? I previously just adjusted the PE AFR vs RPM table to dial in the high map areas. The PE AFR analyzer in EEhack always showed rich <70 kpa. Thanks for any input!

WBO2.jpg

[steveo]

when power enrichment is active you want to hit about 13:1, and when not in power enrichment you want to hit about 14.7:1 (for a street car with lower emissions anyway)

if you adjusted power enrichment using the PE tables first before establishing a clean VE table on a speed density configuration, you did it backwards. you should adjust VE tables first then tune power enrichment. now when you adjust the VE tables you'll mess up your AFR in PE

edit: of course if you're running a maf, you pretty much leave your VE tables alone