Results 1 to 15 of 509

Thread: 1997 F-Body ECM

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    477
    OK, first off sorry for all the confusion I caused. Looks like my typing was faster than my thinking.
    Looking a bit closer at the hardware side...

    PIN C12 (GRAY): This pin is labled not used. Internally it tracks from the gray connector to an input network that defaults it low. The state of the pin is available through the PRU in port C bit 4. I will look at S/W to see how/if it is used.

    PIN C11 (GRAY): This pin is labled TRACTION CONTROL SYSTEM ACTIVE SIGNAL. This pin is defaulted to ignition voltage and tracks to an input network (default high). The state of the pin is available through the PRU in port A bit 0. I will look at S/W to see how/if it is used.

    PIN A23 (RED): This pin is labled TRACTION CONTROL SYSTEM SPARK RETARD REQUEST. This pin is defaulted to ignition voltage and tracks to a schmitt trigger receive curcuit. The input is used by the TPU only (TPU pin 22). We can only look at the inputs and outputs to the TPU and uses educated guesses about what is going on inside. Lots of work needed here to gain an understanding.

    The first post on this topic should have named pin A23 as the source instead of C12. Swap these two references and I believe the post is corrected.

    -Tom

  2. #2
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    477
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom H View Post
    I will look at S/W to see how/if it is used.
    Just quick results here, not exhaustive

    PIN C12 (GRAY): Received through PRU port C ($1804) --> $0123 and $0077. Not used on Tside, but passed through the SPI to the Eside. Eside $0081 and $0059. Used in traction control logic, more effort needed to gain a clear picutre. In my PCM it is a don't care though because there is no connection to the terminal pin.

    PIN C11 (GRAY): Received through PRU port A ($1800) --> $0075 (MASK OFF 4MSBS). Affects traction control flags
    (@$80,$08)

    OK, so nothing unexpected here. C12 is likely just a way that traction control was done in earlier cars before it got integrated into the ABS. Looks to me likely it was just an earlier step in development that was not removed (?).

    -Tom

  3. #3
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Orange, CA
    Posts
    757
    Quote Originally Posted by kur4o View Post
    About the traction control on 94-95.

    There is 2 differnet type of usage incorporated in the code. Analog and digital.
    The analog is used on the y-bodies only. They have some crap bosch abs module.

    The pcm sends pwm encoded signal of tps to ABS via pin A12[needs confirming]
    Abs request spark retard from pcm via a frequency signal at pin A23??[needs confirming].

    There is also second analog system to request traction on.
    Put B+ to pin c12. It is analog on/off switch. Not sure where it is used. ??B-bodies.
    You are incorrect. First, the Bosch ABS is actually awesome, the Bosch 5 more than the 2U, but either way I'll take the Bosch over the Delco any day of the week.

    Second, the EBTCM on 94-95 Y-Bodies does not get a TPS signal from the PCM at all. They use a separate repeater module (called a "TPS Module") that takes the output voltage from the TPS, buffers it, then sends the buffered voltage reading to the EBTCM. This is so that the EBTCM reading the TPS doesn't affect the TPS signal going to the PCM. EDIT: It occurs to me that you may be having a separate thought here and you're no longer talking about Y-Bodies. If this is the case then I apologize; the above functionality is how Y-Body cars supply TPS data to the EBTCM (ABS/ASR).

    Third, as already stated, the ASR (TCS) traction control request is sent to pin C12. The EBTCM merely has an internal switch that connects to +12V to tell the PCM it wants to retard timing for ASR. The PCM then determines how much retard to use and how long to do it for. So far from being just "B-Bodies," this is normal operation for all Bosch ABS vehicles (Y-Body, E-Body, K-Body, B-Body, D-Body).

    No clue where you're getting your information from, but mine is from GM and Bosch directly.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom H View Post
    Just quick results here, not exhaustive

    PIN C12 (GRAY): Received through PRU port C ($1804) --> $0123 and $0077. Not used on Tside, but passed through the SPI to the Eside. Eside $0081 and $0059. Used in traction control logic, more effort needed to gain a clear picutre. In my PCM it is a don't care though because there is no connection to the terminal pin.

    PIN C11 (GRAY): Received through PRU port A ($1800) --> $0075 (MASK OFF 4MSBS). Affects traction control flags
    (@$80,$08)

    OK, so nothing unexpected here. C12 is likely just a way that traction control was done in earlier cars before it got integrated into the ABS. Looks to me likely it was just an earlier step in development that was not removed (?).
    To be perfectly accurate, it's the way all the Bosch-equipped cars did it, up to and including the '96 Y-Body.

    C11, according to my FSMs, is connected to the Cruise Control Cutoff Relay, and is used to trigger the relay to cut out the cruise control when ASR is activated.
    Last edited by NomakeWan; 04-12-2021 at 12:25 AM.
    1990 Corvette (Manual)
    1994 Corvette (Automatic)
    1995 Corvette (Manual)

  4. #4
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    477
    Quote Originally Posted by NomakeWan View Post
    C11, according to my FSMs, is connected to the Cruise Control Cutoff Relay, and is used to trigger the relay to cut out the cruise control when ASR is activated.
    Thank you, that gives me info as to what that flag does. But some confusion, are you saying C11 is an output?


    Ages ago when I first got my Camaro, I entered a Solo II meet here in Canada. The finish stop box was just feet after a sweeping corner. Both myself and another person with a Camaro had great trouble getting the car stopped. Peddle went hard and car kept motoring. First round was no time due to stop box destruction... both cars. The other fellow had the insight to unplug the ABS. Worked a treat. He told me later that his dealer said that there was some sort of "ice" mode the ABS could get into that blocks pressure from the master. Some time I will read my '96 service manual to see how this thing actually works, unless someone here knows.

    -Tom

  5. #5
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Orange, CA
    Posts
    757
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom H View Post
    Thank you, that gives me info as to what that flag does. But some confusion, are you saying C11 is an output?


    Ages ago when I first got my Camaro, I entered a Solo II meet here in Canada. The finish stop box was just feet after a sweeping corner. Both myself and another person with a Camaro had great trouble getting the car stopped. Peddle went hard and car kept motoring. First round was no time due to stop box destruction... both cars. The other fellow had the insight to unplug the ABS. Worked a treat. He told me later that his dealer said that there was some sort of "ice" mode the ABS could get into that blocks pressure from the master. Some time I will read my '96 service manual to see how this thing actually works, unless someone here knows.

    -Tom
    No, sorry, C11 is an input. While I had the device it was connected to correct, I had the pins backwards. The EBTCM is connected to the Cruise Control Cutoff Relay. When the relay is triggered (by the EBTCM), it opens the contact that sends voltage to the Cruise Control Disengage Input on the Cruise Control computer (removing +12V from this input disengages the computer), as well as closing the contact that sends voltage to C11 on the PCM and the "ASR ACTIVE" light on the Driver's Information Center. My Bosch ABS/ASR manual says that this input is for automatic transmission vehicles only, so it may not be used on manual transmission cars. If I had to guess I'd say it's to switch the PCM from the Cruise shift map back to the Normal shift map when ASR cuts off the cruise control.

    On "ice mode," yes, I'm very familiar with it. Chances are your service manual will not tell you anything about it. I know mine don't. For Bosch systems, I do have the actual Bosch book that they wrote about it. Basically, the computer looks at all of its inputs and tries to figure out of the braking force experienced is exceeding the maximum potential threshold of braking for a conventional surface (negative speed delta exceeds set point). If this happens, it assumes that the wheel(s) in question must have come into contact with a low-mu surface (such as ice), and will prevent excessive brake pressure from reaching the calipers. This hopefully allows the wheel(s) in question to resume spinning, returning some level of control to the driver. However, a problem occurs in racing environments where it's entirely possible to have braking equipment and a road surface so good that your braking exceeds that same set point, causing the ABS to think you're on ice, and thus restricting your braking. It's counterintuitive, but if you release the brake pedal momentarily, you 'reset' this input, allowing you to hit the pedal again and should get full braking pressure back. This system is designed and required for all vehicles registered for public roadway use in the US (and probably elsewhere). It is also mandated that the driver should not be able to disable it. This is why dedicated race vehicles tend to use aftermarket ABS which do not have these "nanny" subroutines programmed. Bosch themselves, for example, offer a race-only ABS that does not have any "ice mode" shenanigans.

    That said, I can only speak for how Bosch systems work, and it looks like F-Body cars don't use Bosch systems. On a Bosch system, there is a lateral accelerometer linked into the ABS that measures how "hard" you are cornering. On these vehicles, most of the "ice mode" incidents happen in straight-line braking. I was already developing an aftermarket G-sensor for 94-96 Y-Body cars, but after reading up on "ice mode" woes, I believe I can counteract it with the very same sensor. Essentially, giving it a "race mode" that sends false high lateral G-load data to the ABS during straight-line braking, thus convincing the ABS that it cannot possibly use "ice" logic since it's impossible to have such high lateral G-loads on ice. I have not yet tested this system, but according to Bosch's ABS operational theory, it should work.


    EDIT:
    So I discovered the discrepancy between the usage of pin B22 between what is marked on page 13 of this thread and what's marked in my FSMs. It turns out that it is in fact a difference between vehicles. The F-Body does not use this pin (apparently). The Y-Body uses this pin as "Cruise Control Active," which assumedly is what tells the PCM to use the cruise shift map (which the 4L60E manual claims 'delays the 3->4 upshift and TCC apply during heavy throttle', but the cruise maps for upshifts, downshifts, and TCC apply/release appear to be identical to the normal maps on my Y-body calibrations). However, the B-Body uses pin B22 as a connection to a TCC Temperature Switch located in the feed line to the transmission cooler that connects this pin to ground when the fluid temperature is over 325F. Additionally, the B-Body calibrations have radically different "Cruise Mode" maps compared to Normal Mode maps. The B-Body also has no "cruise control active" input.

    This leads me to believe that, in fact, the input itself is used the same way--the input triggers the PCM to switch to the "Cruise" map. But the B-Body has populated its "cruise" map with "hot" values, essentially using the cruise map to account for overheated transmission fluid. Why it does this even though the PCM already has a "hot" map and the B-Body has a transmission fluid sensor input on pin D28 is beyond me.
    Last edited by NomakeWan; 04-12-2021 at 11:45 AM. Reason: Added additional information about B22
    1990 Corvette (Manual)
    1994 Corvette (Automatic)
    1995 Corvette (Manual)

  6. #6
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,478
    The info I posted is straight from disassembly. That is the usage of traction and how it is handled by the pcm. Linking the code with platforms is not an easy task, so thanks for figuring that part. I suspect the frequency input was designed to allow abs to request specific not only retard but how much of a retard. ANyway it seems overkill left over for something more complex.

    B22 might be configured in the calibration how to be used. I need to check that out.

    Does anybody knows if that ICE mode is only bosch related, or is experienced on other abs modules. 98+ fbodies also come with bosch abs.
    We can also make that statement. Bosch= built to brake. AC Delco= built to last.

  7. #7
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Orange, CA
    Posts
    757
    Quote Originally Posted by kur4o View Post
    Does anybody knows if that ICE mode is only bosch related, or is experienced on other abs modules. 98+ fbodies also come with bosch abs.
    We can also make that statement. Bosch= built to brake. AC Delco= built to last.
    "Ice Mode" is required by law, so it should be present in all ABS systems regardless of manufacturer. My statement about how exactly that logic was implemented and how to potentially circumvent it, however, only applies to how Bosch handled it in the Bosch 2U and Bosch 5 present in the 1992-1996 Y-Body. Not everyone uses an accelerometer, for example, to accompany their ABS logic. And some companies use longitudinal accelerometers rather than lateral (for example, the Nissan Skyline GT-R uses a longitudinal accelerometer with its ABS logic).
    1990 Corvette (Manual)
    1994 Corvette (Automatic)
    1995 Corvette (Manual)

Similar Threads

  1. 94-95 LT1 $EE Y-body vs. F/B-body PCM differences
    By johnny_b in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-15-2023, 02:41 PM
  2. Tuner Pro XDF 1999-2000 F Body + Y Body
    By john h in forum OBDII Tuning
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 02-02-2020, 11:12 PM
  3. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 09-20-2018, 06:00 AM
  4. F-body engine install to B-body
    By serge_an in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-22-2016, 02:51 PM
  5. 95 F-body Fuel Pump with 95 B-Body Engine/Tank
    By EPS3 in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-19-2016, 02:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •